|
The term "present age" is a concept in the philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard. A formulation of the modern age can be found in Kierkegaard's work ''Two Ages: A Literary Review'': Kierkegaard argues the present age drains the meaning out of ethical concepts through passionless indolence. The concepts are still used, but are drained of all meaning by virtue of their detachment from a life view which is passion-generated and produces consistent action.〔Lillegard, Norman. ''Thinking with Kierkegaard and MacIntyre about Virtue'', in: ''Kierkegaard after MacIntyre''.〕 Kierkegaard published this book in 1846 just after the Corsair Affair in which he was attacked by the press. He attacks not only the Press but the Public it serves in this book. He is against abstract moments in time or public opinion as a basis for forming relationships. He wrote about the single individual in his ''Eighteen Upbuilding Discourses'' and kept to that category here. Newspapers were mediating information and individuals were joining together based on this mediating influence. The same thing is happening now with the internet. Kierkegaard advised that "real" people retain a concrete identity in the face of an abstract public opinion. He wrote: ==Interpretations== ''The Present Age'' and ''Two Minor Ethico-Religious Treatises'' were originally translated by Walter Lowrie and Alexander Dru in 1940. Later, in 1962, Alexander Dru's translation of ''The Present Age'' was published along with ''Of The Difference Between a Genius and an Apostle''.〔The second essay of the above mentioned two minor essays, the first essay was ''Has a Man the Right to Let Himself Be Put to Death for the Truth?''〕 This translation had a long introduction by Walter Kaufmann. Several contemporary philosophers, including Anthony Rudd, John Davenport, and Alasdair MacIntyre〔Davenport, John; Rudd, Anthony; and MacIntyre, Alasdair. ''Kierkegaard after MacIntyre: essays on freedom, narrative, and virtue'', 2001, pp. 226–229.〕 allocate this concept and apply it as an analysis of nihilism. Hubert Dreyfus, for example in his essay "Anonymity vrs. Commitment in the Present Age", argues that Kierkegaard, "who was always concerned with nihilism, warns that his age is characterized by a disinterested reflection and curiosity that levels all differences of status and value." Other thinkers apply the concept as a symptom of herd behavior or mob mentality. Norman Lillegard argues that the present age is "incapable of anything but 'crowd actions' which are not true actions at all."〔Lillegard, Norman. ''Thinking with Kierkegaard and MacIntyre about Virtue'', in: ''Kierkegaard after MacIntyre''.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Present age」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|